Stretchable nanofibers of polyvinylidenefluoride (PVDF)/thermoplastic polyurethane (TPU) nanocomposite to support piezoelectric response via mechanical elasticity

Scientific Reports volume 12, Article number: 8335 (2022) Cite this article

3811 Accesses

6 Citations

1 Altmetric

Metrics details

An Author Correction to this article was published on 28 June 2022

This article has been updated

Interest in piezoelectric nanocomposites has been vastly growing in the energy harvesting field. They are applied in wearable electronics, mechanical actuators, and electromechanical membranes. In this research work, nanocomposite membranes of different blend ratios from PVDF and TPU have been synthesized. The PVDF is responsible for piezoelectric performance where it is one of the promising polymeric organic materials containing β-sheets, to convert applied mechanical stress into electric voltage. In addition, the TPU is widely used in the plastic industry due to its superior elasticity. Our work investigates the piezoresponse analysis for different blending ratios of PVDF/TPU. It has been found that TPU blending ratios of 15–17.5% give higher output voltage at different stresses conditions along with higher piezosensitivity. Then, TPU addition with its superior mechanical elasticity can partially compensate PVDF to enhance the piezoelectric response of the PVDF/TPU nanocomposite mats. This work can help reducing the amount of added PVDF in piezoelectric membranes with enhanced piezo sensitivity and mechanical elasticity.

Over the last few decades, extensive research regarding the use of alternative energy sources has been carried out1. This has mainly followed the use of various clean and renewable energy sources due to their sustainability and environmental friendliness2. Moreover, energy harvesting technologies have recently been the main focus, where wasted energy from ambient environments is utilized. Such technologies can transform vibrations, heat, light, radiation, wind, and water into electrical energies for low-power devices1. Research has also extended further to include energy harvesting in biomedical applications3 and offered promising biomedical sensors and wearable electronics4,5, due to the ability to harvest kinetic energy in the form of vibrations from direct human activities such as walking, running, and finger tapping to heartbeat and respiration6,7. The kinetic energy is harvested based on three transduction mechanisms; piezoelectric, electromagnetic, or electrostatic. Because of their high energy density, simple design, and the ability to be scaled down to micro-and nanoscale devices, piezoelectric energy harvesters have gained the most attention8,9,10. Piezoelectric materials also possess the unique ability to convert mechanical energy into electricity directly, without an external input11,12. Therefore, numerous efforts have been put into developing high-performance piezoelectric nanogenerators using organic and inorganic materials13,14,15.

It has been found that organic piezoelectric materials have greater benefits than inorganic materials, including a higher level of processability16. Such materials have been seen to be applicable in a wide range of devices, with polymer-based materials being more preferred due to their intrinsic flexible nature, providing a great degree of bending and biodegradability17,18. Among all piezoelectric polymers, poly(vinylidene fluoride) (PVDF) films have shown the highest piezoelectric performances to date19,20,21. Due to the polar crystalline nature of PVDF, its ability to produce large voltages with low forces has made it favorable for piezoelectric applications20,22,23. The piezoelectric property of PVDF mainly depends on its β-phase, one of its four crystalline phases22,24. In addition to its lightweight, flexibility, resistance to solvents, and stability under high electric fields, it is considered as the optimum biomaterial for applications in energy harvesters, force sensors, and transducers.

PVDF nanofibers are the core candidate for such applications, especially wearable and implantable devices. The main techniques used to fabricate such fibers include electrospinning, melt spinning, and centrifugal spinning25,26. Electrospinning has been the most promising as it can form nanofibers from solutions or melts with variable diameters. Additionally, it has been reported that the β-phase content in PVDF nanofibers produced by electrospinning is higher than that of PVDF cast films, thereby improving its piezoelectric properties27.

Electrospinning also provides the ability to further enhance the piezoelectric properties of the fabricated PVDF nanofibers due to its ability to produce aligned fibers with hollow structures or various additives for improved performance28. Such additives include carbon nanotubes (CNTs), graphene, and ZnO29. A previous study has successfully produced a nanogenerator from PVDF-ZnO nanocomposite, showing that adding ZnO particles increased its output voltage30. Furthermore, piezoelectric nanogenerators incorporating ZnO have successfully been implanted in live rats to harvest energy from heartbeats and breathing motion. That study has shown great potential for using PVDF-ZnO nanogenerators as a power source for implantable biomedical electronic devices, which suggests a strong potential for such devices in applications related to the normalization of the heartbeat and brain stimulation for the treatment of movement disorders31. Furthermore, PVDF and its copolymers have been utilized for pressure sensing applications, serving as healthcare monitoring devices for respiration signals. Composites of PVDF and graphene oxides were also developed for multiple sensory applications, exhibiting a high sensitivity for monitoring simultaneous artery pulse pressures and temperatures32. PVDF nanofibers have also been explored for the application of blood pressure sensors due to their excellent flexibility33, and has successfully been tested on an in vitro model where PVDF thin films were wrapped around the aorta, and periodic signals of output current and voltage were generated with the movement of the artery, showing a great sensitivity.

Compared to multiple composites, the addition of thermoplastic polyurethane (TPU) has shown great potential for enhancing mechanical properties34. Such characteristics may be required for applications in wound healing and filtration.

Several studies have investigated PVDF/TPU composite mat characteristics and performance for different electrical and biomedical applications35,36,37,38. PVDF/TPU electrospun scaffolds were introduced for wound healing, where cell migration and fibroblast activities were seen to be improved due to the piezoelectricity of the composite material39. Another study has evaluated the changes in piezoelectric and mechanical properties regarding the addition of TPU with PVDF nanofibers40. The results showed more flexibility in dipole excitations inside PVDF due to the elastic content of TPU. (GO)/Bi2S3-PVDF/TPU composite nanofiber mat was developed for photothermal applications41, combining GO/Bi2S3 nanoparticles as a photothermal conversion material and electrospun PVDF/TPU membrane as a substrate. The results observed that the hybrid novel mat has about a 95% light absorption rate at a wavelength range of 400–2500 nm. In addition, the presence of TPU significantly improved the mechanical strength of the composite film. TPU and bismuth sodium titanate polycrystalline oxide (Bi0.5Na0.5TiO3; BNT) were blended with (PVDF) and casted with the aid of a blade coater to investigate their effect on the piezoelectric response of composite membranes42. The remarkable enhancement in face shear piezoelectric coefficient (d36) was revealed by adjusting the blending content of TPU due to micro-pore structure formation, which facilitates charge transfer under different stress types.

In our work, we analyze the detailed mechanical and piezoelectric characteristics of different blending ratios of PVDF and TPU nanofiber mats synthesized by the electrospinning process. In detail, we check the optimum blending ratios to generate the maximum voltage at different applied forces. In addition, we show the impact of frequency of the applied force on the piezoresponse behavior of different blended nanofiber mats. This work is helpful for wearable electronics and energy harvesting units.

Polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF) (Kynar, Arkema, PA, USA) is supplied by ARKEMA and thermoplastic polyurethane (TPU) with Polydispersity Index (PDI) of 1.83 and molecular weight of 107,020 g mol−1 is supplied by (BASF Co., Ltd., Berlin, Germany). Known polymer concentrations have been dispersed in dimethylformamide (DMF 98%, Sigma Aldrich, Taufkirchen, Germany).

Different blending ratios of PVDF and TPU solution with a constant polymer concentration of 10% were prepared and processed through the electrospinning setup. Comparative study of the effect of TPU addition on the piezoelectric and mechanical properties of PVDF mat has been introduced through five different blending ratios of PVDF/TPU (95:5, 90:10, 87.7:12.5, 85:15, 82.5:17.5, 80:20, 75:25, and 70:30). The electrospinning process was performed by adding 10 mL of polymer solution into a plastic syringe tipped with a stainless steel needle. The positive voltages were provided from a high voltage power supply CZE1000R (Spellman, Hauppauge, NY, USA) to the metallic needle with gauge 18, for application of voltages around 25 kV with a constant feed rate of (1 mL/h) using a NE1000 syringe pump (New Era Pump Systems, Suffolk County, NY, USA). Needle-to-collector distance adjusted to 10 cm. Random PVDF/TPU nanofibers composite was collected on a drum collector covered with aluminum foil and connected to the ground.

The morphology of PVDF/TPU nanofibers (NFs) was observed by scanning electron microscope (JEOL JSM-6010LV-SEM, Tokyo, Japan) with an accelerating voltage of 15 kV. The nanofiber mats were placed on carbon tape fixed on aluminum stubs and sputter-coated with platinum. The diameter of NFs was analyzed using Image-J software (Madison, WI, USA). The average fiber diameter distribution was manually detected by measuring the length through fiber boundaries at different imaging scales (50 µm, 10 µm, and 1 µm). Fourier transform infrared spectrometer (FT-IR) (Vertex 70 FT-IR, Bruker, Billerica, MA, USA) was adjusted in ATR mode. Samples were scanned 120 times at a resolution of 5 cm−1 over a range of 4000–400 cm−1 to study the chemical functional groups of blended mats.

Testing the effect of TPU addition on the mechanical properties of the fabricated mats was performed by cutting the nanofiber membranes into equal rectangular pieces (1 × 6 cm). The samples were fixed between holding frames with a gauge length of 4 cm. A universal testing machine (TENSO LAB 5000, Mesdan, Italy) was used to perform the stress–strain curve. The tensile test was conducted at a strain rate equal to 10 mm/min with zero initial loads using a load cell of 100 N.

The synthesized PVDF/TPU nanofiber membranes were tested under a cyclic load using an excitation instrument constructed for this purpose (Fig. 1). The instrument consists of a lightweight spring plunger assembly that oscillates vertically. The excitation frequency is controlled by varying the speed of the brushless DC motor driving the plunger using an electronic speed controller. The sample is sandwiched between two sheets of foil connected through shielded wires to a high impedance oscilloscope (Tektronix MDO3014) and then placed underneath the plunger. The maximum load is controlled by controlling the height of the plunger and therefore changing the compression distance of the spring upon engagement with the sample during operation. The maximum applied force ranged between 1 and 3 N, and peak-to-peak voltage was measured accordingly.

Schematic representation of the piezoelectric characterization set-up (a), and a picture of real set-up (b).

Piezoelectric voltage signals from the PVDF/TPU nanofibers were analyzed through a simple impulse loading setup, as shown in Figure 2. The nanofiber mats were placed between two copper sheets, connected to a high impedance oscilloscope through shielded wires, and exposed to different weights for the impulse loading test. The weights, ranging from 50 to 250 g, were dropped onto the sandwiched nanofibers from a fixed height of 5 cm. The resulting voltage was then detected and assessed (Fig. 2).

Schematic representation of the impulse loading set-up (a), and a picture of real set-up (b).

Figure 3 shows the SEM images of PVDF/TPU composite nanofibers. The images show homogenous fibers distribution with minimum beads formation. The average fiber diameter was calculated, and a histogram of fiber distribution was presented in Fig. 3. The results show an average fibers diameter for pure PVDF and blended composite mats in the range of 254 nm to 267 nm. It was observed that the TPU addition didn't significantly affect the fiber diameter, which ensures the high compatibility and homogeneity of the mixed polymer solution.

SEM images of pure PVDF (a), TPU 15% (b), TPU 25% (c), and TPU 30% (d) composite nanofibers membranes.

The FT-IR spectra of nanofibrous composite membranes are shown in Fig. 4. The FT-IR data is introduced to identify the crystalline phases of PVDF. PVDF can be formed in different five crystalline phases (α, β, γ, δ, and ε). The α-phase is considered the most obtained and stable non-polar phase of PVDF, while the β-phase is responsible for enhancing the piezoelectric properties. It was found that the electrospinning process can improve the piezoelectricity of PVDF by increasing the β-phase content; this can be attributed to the effect of the high electric field, which induces the dipoles to be aligned in the same direction, normal to the chain axis forming spontaneous polarization and exhibiting a strong piezoelectric effect. As shown in Fig. 4a, the graph shows the main characteristic bands for PVDF at 840 cm−1 for CH2 rocking, C–C and CF2 stretching, 1175 and 1400 cm−1 for C-F, and C-H vibrations, respectively43,44,45. While the characteristic bands of TPU appeared at 1533, 1735, 2971, 3365 cm−1 corresponding to –CONH– asymmetrical bond, C=O, C–H, and N–H stretching, respectively46,47. The resultant data in Fig. 4a clarifies the intensity decrease in PVDF absorption bands with increasing TPU content. Moreover, the characteristic peaks of TPU strongly appeared with higher TPU concentrations addition compared to the pure PVDF, as presented in Fig. 4b,c.

FT-IR curves for PVDF/TPU composite nanofibers.

The beta-phase content was calculated according to the following equation derived from Beer-Lambert law;

where Aα and Aβ are the intensities of absorbance bands at 764 cm−1 and 840 cm−1 respectively.

As shown in Table 1, remarkably high polar beta-sheets content was observed for pure PVDF and TPU 15%, confirming the superior piezoelectric response of the TPU 15% composite mat. It was reported that the improvement in β-phase content in electrospun nanofibers is attributed to polymer jet stretching under a high electric field inside the electrospinning process45. Hence, the high β-phase content for TPU 15% can be attributed to the effect of TPU mechanical elasticity on facilitating the reorientation of electric dipoles inside the composite nanofiber under the exposure of applied mechanical excitation42. However, the more increase of TPU content beyond 15%; the composite loses the resulting polarizability and the corresponding beta-sheets content from the PVDF.

Figure 5 shows the stress–strain curves of PVDF/TPU composite nanofiber membranes. It was clearly observed that the addition of TPU significantly improved the mechanical properties of the produced membranes. TPU 25% and 30% revealed nearly similar maximum tensile strength of ~ 7 MPa and breaking strain of ~ 97%. While the pure PVDF and low TPU concentrations (5% and 10%) showed low elasticity with tensile strength below 2 MPa, and elongation at breakage of 23%. As seen, increasing the TPU content up to 30% has increased membrane's elasticity more than fourfold of the pure PVDF. TPU 15% showed optimum behavior between high and low TPU concentrations with a tensile strength of 3.8 MPa and a breaking strain of 82%. These superior mechanical elasticity characteristics of PVDF/TPU composite membranes make them a good candidate for several applications, which need high elasticity, such as strain gauge, wound healing, and air filtration39,48,49.

Stress–strain curves of PVDF/TPU composite nanofibers.

Regarding the Force-Voltage analysis for different PVDF/TPU concentrations, Table 2 highlights each sample tested along with the resulting voltage at the minimum and maximum forces used. It can be noted that the resulting voltage appeared to increase by increasing the force applied and the TPU concentration. However, it is seen that a great increase in the TPU concentrations resulted in lower peak-to-peak voltages or provided disruptive results. The PVDF/TPU composite nanofiber mats with a concentration of 15% TPU appeared to have the highest value, while the highest concentration of TPU (30%) provided unstable results. This result was confirmed with a recent study that investigates the effect of TPU and bismuth sodium titanate polycrystalline oxide (BNT) addition on the piezoelectric coefficient of PVDF42. The experiments showed that the intensity of face shear electro-mechanical coupling is remarkably affected by TPU addition. Significant enhancement of piezoelectric coefficient d36 is obtained when a small portion of TPU (≤ 5%) is introduced into the composite. Within the range of 5–20%, a nearly linear increase of d36can be achieved; then, it decreases at higher TPU concentration (> 20%)42. The polarization inside the nanocomposite is mainly in the direction of mat's thickness due to the electric field direction inside the electrospinning process. However, TPU mostly affects a shear strain. Based on the resulted improvement of piezoresponse, we think that such shear strain helps in a better orientation of polarizability to make more aligned dipoles in the thickness’ direction, and consequently enhanced generated output voltage at the sample applied normal force.

To better highlight the effects of frequency (f) on the different PVDF/TPU composites, a comparison has been made between PVDF/TPU 30% and PVDF/TPU 10% with cyclic forces applied at a rate of 16 Hz and 8 Hz. It can be concluded that relatively lower TPU concentrations responded better to mechanical vibrational frequencies. In comparison, higher TPU concentration in the PVDF/TPU composite nanofibers resulted in unstable peaks and an undetectable electrical potential. Both Figs. 6 and 7 show the relation between peak-to-peak voltage and applied forces on PVDF/TPU composite mats at different constant frequencies of 8 Hz and 16 Hz, respectively. Figure 8 shows that the 15% of TPU is the best blending ratio to generate the maximum output voltage at different applied mechanical vibrational frequencies, along with a better linear behavior within voltage-force relation compared to other around blending ratios, such as 12.5 and 17.5 wt%. However, it can be observed that the 17.5 wt% shows a better piezosensitivity compared to other blending ratios. Therefore, it can be concluded that the range between 15 and 17.5 wt% of TPU blending ratio shows the best piezoelectric performance from the perspective of output voltage and piezosensitivity.

Relation between peak-to-peak voltage and applied forces at a frequency of 8 Hz.

Relation between peak-to-peak voltage and applied forces at a frequency of 16 Hz.

Output voltage at different mechanical frequencies with an applied force of 3 N.

The piezoelectric response of nanofiber mats from different PVDF/TPU composites was analyzed under impulse loading impact from a fixed height of 1 cm. Within most samples, it was observed that the resulting voltage increased while increasing the exposed weight as shown in Fig. 9. Relatively higher output voltage resulted for pure PVDF, while PVDF/TPU blended composite mats showed an apparent decrease in electrical potential at the highest exposed weight (150 gm). In addition, it was observed that TPU 15% had output voltage values relative or similar to pure PVDF, compared to the other samples.

Piezoelectric response of different PVDF/TPU composite nanofiber mats under different impulse weight loading from 5 cm height.

In this work, we investigated the characteristics of piezoelectric elastic nanocomposites mats. The synthesized nanofiber mats were composed of PVDF with TPU. The piezoelectric performance of the nanocomposite is related to PVDF, and the elasticity feature is related to the blended TPU. Our synthesized mats have been used to generate electric voltage under the effect of different mechanical excitations, such as mechanical stresses, with both controlled forces and vibration frequencies, along with impulse loading via falling masses. The optimum piezoelectric response is found at a blending ratio of TPU between 15 and 17.5 wt%, based on output voltage and piezosensitivity. Although the ratio of PVDF is reduced, the mechanical elasticity of blended TPU causes an improvement in the piezoelectric response of the nanocomposite. This conclusion has been supported by different measurements of piezoelectric voltage at different amplitudes and frequencies of vibrational forces, along with impulsive fallen masses. Meanwhile, FTIR analysis showed that the beta-sheets of 85:15 nanocomposite are nearly equal to the pure PVDF nanofiber mats. This innovative elastic-piezo nanocomposite can be applied within energy harvesting membranes and wearable electronics.

A Correction to this paper has been published: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-15428-8

Jurasz, J., Canales, F., Kies, A., Guezgouz, M. & Beluco, A. A review on the complementarity of renewable energy sources: Concept, metrics, application and future research directions. Sol. Energy 195, 703–724 (2020).

Article ADS Google Scholar

Dyatlov, S., Didenko, N., Ivanova, E., Soshneva, E. & Kulik, S. Prospects for alternative energy sources in global energy sector. In IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science 012014 (2020).

Mokhtari, F., Azimi, B., Salehi, M., Hashemikia, S. & Danti, S. Recent advances of polymer-based piezoelectric composites for biomedical applications. J. Mech. Behav. Biomed. Mater. 122, 104669 (2021).

Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar

Shehata, N. et al. Acoustic energy harvesting and sensing via electrospun PVDF nanofiber membrane. Sensors 20, 3111 (2020).

Article ADS CAS PubMed Central Google Scholar

Zhou, H. et al. Stretchable piezoelectric energy harvesters and self-powered sensors for wearable and implantable devices. Biosens. Bioelectron. 168, 112569 (2020).

Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar

Liu, Y. et al. Piezoelectric energy harvesting for self-powered wearable upper limb applications. Nano Select 2, 1459–1479 (2021).

Article Google Scholar

Zhu, M., Yi, Z., Yang, B. & Lee, C. Making use of nanoenergy from human–nanogenerator and self-powered sensor enabled sustainable wireless iot sensory systems. Nano Today 36, 101016 (2021).

Article Google Scholar

Covaci, C. & Gontean, A. Piezoelectric energy harvesting solutions: A review. Sensors 20, 3512 (2020).

Article ADS CAS PubMed Central Google Scholar

Sezer, N. & Koç, M. A comprehensive review on the state-of-the-art of piezoelectric energy harvesting. Nano Energy 80, 105567 (2020).

Article CAS Google Scholar

Atif, R. et al. Solution blow spinning of polyvinylidene fluoride based fibers for energy harvesting applications: A review. Polymers 12, 1304 (2020).

Article CAS PubMed Central Google Scholar

Shivashankar, P. & Gopalakrishnan, S. Review on the use of piezoelectric materials for active vibration, noise, and flow control. Smart Mater. Struct. 29, 053001 (2020).

Article ADS CAS Google Scholar

Rincón-Quintero, A. et al. Generation and capture of electric energy using piezoelectric materials: a review. In IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 012031 (2021).

Sahoo, S., Walke, P., Nayak, S. K., Rout, C. S. & Late, D. J. Recent developments in self-powered smart chemical sensors for wearable electronics. Nano Res. 14, 3669–3689 (2021).

Article ADS CAS Google Scholar

Wang, F. et al. High performance piezoelectric nanogenerator with silver nanowires embedded in polymer matrix for mechanical energy harvesting. Ceram. Int. 47, 35096–35104 (2021).

Article CAS Google Scholar

Rana, M. M. et al. Porosity modulated high-performance piezoelectric nanogenerator based on organic/inorganic nanomaterials for self-powered structural health monitoring. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces. 12, 47503–47512 (2020).

Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar

Li, Q., Zhao, J., He, B. & Hu, Z. Solution processable poly (vinylidene fluoride)-based ferroelectric polymers for flexible electronics. APL Mater. 9, 010902 (2021).

Article ADS CAS Google Scholar

Xu, Q. et al. Construction of bio-piezoelectric platforms: From structures and synthesis to applications. Adv. Mater. 33, 2008452 (2021).

Article CAS Google Scholar

Keum, K. et al. Flexible/stretchable supercapacitors with novel functionality for wearable electronics. Adv. Mater. 32, 2002180 (2020).

Article CAS Google Scholar

Cho, Y. et al. BaTiO3@ PVDF-TrFE nanocomposites with efficient orientation prepared via phase separation nano-coating method for piezoelectric performance improvement and application to 3D-PENG. Chem. Eng. J. 427, 131030 (2022).

Article CAS Google Scholar

Sukumaran, S. et al. Recent advances in flexible PVDF based piezoelectric polymer devices for energy harvesting applications. J. Intell. Mater. Syst. Struct. 32, 746–780 (2021).

Article CAS Google Scholar

Sharafkhani, S. & Kokabi, M. High performance flexible actuator: PVDF nanofibers incorporated with axially aligned carbon nanotubes. Compos. Part B. Eng. 222, 109060 (2021).

Article CAS Google Scholar

He, Z., Rault, F., Lewandowski, M., Mohsenzadeh, E. & Salaün, F. Electrospun PVDF nanofibers for piezoelectric applications: A review of the influence of electrospinning parameters on the β phase and crystallinity enhancement. Polymers 13, 174 (2021).

Article CAS PubMed Central Google Scholar

Zhang, S., Zhang, B., Zhang, J. & Ren, K. Enhanced piezoelectric performance of various electrospun PVDF nanofibers and related self-powered device applications. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces. 13, 32242–32250 (2021).

Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar

Ghafari, E., Jiang, X. & Lu, N. Surface morphology and beta-phase formation of single polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF) composite nanofibers. Adv. Compos. Hybrid Mater. 1, 332–340 (2018).

Article CAS Google Scholar

Song, J., Kim, M. & Lee, H. Recent Advances on nanofiber fabrications: Unconventional state-of-the-art spinning techniques. Polymers 12, 1386 (2020).

Article CAS PubMed Central Google Scholar

Alghoraibi, I. & Alomari, S. Different methods for nanofiber design and fabrication. Handb. nanofibers 1, 1–46 (2018).

Google Scholar

Elnabawy, E. et al. Solution blow spinning of piezoelectric nanofiber mat for detecting mechanical and acoustic signals. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 138, 51322 (2021).

Article CAS Google Scholar

Gee, S., Johnson, B. & Smith, A. Optimizing electrospinning parameters for piezoelectric PVDF nanofiber membranes. J. Membr. Sci. 563, 804–812 (2018).

Article CAS Google Scholar

Shehata, N. et al. Static-aligned piezoelectric poly (vinylidene fluoride) electrospun nanofibers/MWCNT composite membrane: Facile method. Polymers 10, 965 (2018).

Article PubMed Central CAS Google Scholar

Choi, M. et al. Mechanical and electrical characterization of PVDF-ZnO hybrid structure for application to nanogenerator. Nano Energy 33, 462–468 (2017).

Article CAS Google Scholar

Mahanty, B. et al. ZnO nanoparticle confined stress amplified all-fiber piezoelectric nanogenerator for self-powered healthcare monitoring. Sustain. Energy Fuels 5, 4389–4400 (2021).

Article CAS Google Scholar

Park, J., Kim, M., Lee, Y., Lee, H. S. & Ko, H. Fingertip skin–inspired microstructured ferroelectric skins discriminate static/dynamic pressure and temperature stimuli. Sci. Adv. 1, e1500661 (2015).

Article ADS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

Sharma, T., Aroom, K., Naik, S., Gill, B. & Zhang, J. X. Flexible thin-film PVDF-TrFE based pressure sensor for smart catheter applications. Ann. Biomed. Eng. 41, 744–751 (2013).

Article PubMed Google Scholar

Aurilia, M., Piscitelli, F., Sorrentino, L., Lavorgna, M. & Iannace, S. Detailed analysis of dynamic mechanical properties of TPU nanocomposite: The role of the interfaces. Eur. Polymer J. 47, 925–936 (2011).

Article CAS Google Scholar

Lin, M.-F., Xiong, J., Wang, J., Parida, K. & Lee, P. S. Core-shell nanofiber mats for tactile pressure sensor and nanogenerator applications. Nano Energy 44, 248–255 (2018).

Article CAS Google Scholar

Roy, K. et al. A self-powered wearable pressure sensor and pyroelectric breathing sensor based on GO interfaced PVDF nanofibers. ACS Appl. Nano Mater. 2, 2013–2025 (2019).

Article CAS Google Scholar

Kweon, O. Y., Lee, S. J. & Oh, J. H. Wearable high-performance pressure sensors based on three-dimensional electrospun conductive nanofibers. NPG Asia Mater. 10, 540–551 (2018).

Article CAS Google Scholar

Lee, J. et al. A stretchable strain sensor based on a metal nanoparticle thin film for human motion detection. Nanoscale 6, 11932–11939 (2014).

Article ADS CAS PubMed Google Scholar

Guo, H.-F. et al. Piezoelectric PU/PVDF electrospun scaffolds for wound healing applications. Colloids Surf., B 96, 29–36 (2012).

Article CAS Google Scholar

Elnabawy, E. et al. Piezoelastic PVDF/TPU nanofibrous composite membrane: fabrication and characterization. Polymers 11, 1634 (2019).

Article CAS PubMed Central Google Scholar

Yang, W. et al. GO/Bi2S3 doped PVDF/TPU nanofiber membrane with enhanced photothermal performance. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 21, 4224 (2020).

Article CAS PubMed Central Google Scholar

Dai, Z. et al. Thermoplastic polyurethane elastomer induced shear piezoelectric coefficient enhancement in bismuth sodium titanate–PVDF composite films. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 138, 49818 (2021).

Article CAS Google Scholar

Mahato, P., Seal, A., Garain, S. & Sen, S. Effect of fabrication technique on the crystalline phase and electrical properties of PVDF films. Mater. Sci.-Pol. 33, 157–162 (2015).

Article ADS CAS Google Scholar

Kaspar, P. et al. Characterization of polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF) electrospun fibers doped by carbon flakes. Polymers 12, 2766 (2020).

Article CAS PubMed Central Google Scholar

Sengupta, D. et al. Characterization of single polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF) nanofiber for flow sensing applications. AIP Adv. 7, 105205 (2017).

Article ADS CAS Google Scholar

Gergeroglu, H. & Huseyin, A. Functional composite nanofibers derived from natural extract of Satureja hortensis. Anadolu Univ. J. Sci. Technol. A-Appl. Sci. Eng. 18, 908–918 (2017).

Google Scholar

Shaker, A., Hassanin, A. H., Shaalan, N., Hassan, M. & Abd El-Moneim, A. Micropatterned flexible strain gauge sensor based on wet electrospun polyurethane/PEDOT: PSS nanofibers. Smart Mater. Struct. 28, 075029 (2019).

Article ADS CAS Google Scholar

Chen, R. et al. Transparent thermoplastic polyurethane air filters for efficient electrostatic capture of particulate matter pollutants. Nanotechnology 30, 015703 (2018).

Article ADS PubMed CAS Google Scholar

Tang, J., Wu, Y., Ma, S., Yan, T. & Pan, Z. Flexible strain sensor based on CNT/TPU composite nanofiber yarn for smart sports bandage. Compos. Part B Eng. 232, 109605 (2022).

Article CAS Google Scholar

Download references

The Project was Funded by Kuwait Foundation for the Advancement of Sciences under project code: PR20-15SP-01. In addition, the authors would like to thank ARKEMA for providing the PVDF polymer; Kynar-761.

Kuwait College of Science and Technology (KCST), 13133, Doha, Kuwait

Nader Shehata, Remya Nair, Rabab Boualayan, Ishac Kandas & Abdulrzak Masrani

Center of Smart Materials, Nanotechnology and Photonics (CSMNP), Smart CI Research Center, Alexandria University, Alexandria, 21544, Egypt

Nader Shehata, Ishac Kandas, Eman Elnabawy, Nada Omran, Mohammed Gamal & Ahmed H. Hassanin

Department of Engineering Mathematics and Physics, Faculty of Engineering, Alexandria University, Alexandria, 21544, Egypt

Nader Shehata & Ishac Kandas

USTAR Bioinnovations Center, Faculty of Science, Utah State University, Logan, UT, 84341, USA

Nader Shehata

Department of Mechanical Engineering, Roberts Engineering Building, University College London (UCL), London, WC1E 7JW, UK

Rabab Boualayan

Micro System Design and Manufacturing Center, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Bilkent University, Ankara, 06800, Turkey

Abdulrzak Masrani

Material Science and Engineering Department, School of Innovative Design Engineering, Egypt-Japan University of Science andTechnology (E-JUST), New Borg El-Arab City, Alexandria, Egypt

Ahmed H. Hassanin

Department of Textile Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Alexandria University, Alexandria, 21544, Egypt

Ahmed H. Hassanin

You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

The role of each author in the manuscript is shown as follows: Conceptualization, by N.S. and A.H. Data curation, By R.B., R.N., E.E., N.O., and M.G. Formal analysis, by all authors. Funding acquisition, by N.S. Investigation, by N.S., I.K. and A.H. Methodology, by R.B., R.N., A.M. Project administration, by N.S. Supervision, by N.S., I.K., and A.H. Writing—original draft, by R.B. and E.E. Writing—review editing, by all authors.

Correspondence to Nader Shehata.

The authors declare no competing interests.

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

The original online version of this Article was revised: The original version of this Article contained an error in the spelling of the author Abdulrzak Masrani which was incorrectly given as Abdulrazak Masrani.

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and Permissions

Shehata, N., Nair, R., Boualayan, R. et al. Stretchable nanofibers of polyvinylidenefluoride (PVDF)/thermoplastic polyurethane (TPU) nanocomposite to support piezoelectric response via mechanical elasticity. Sci Rep 12, 8335 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-11465-5

Download citation

Received: 10 December 2021

Accepted: 14 March 2022

Published: 18 May 2022

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-11465-5

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.